2016 Ford Ranger: common problems and MOT failures
What MOT testers find on the Ford Ranger first registered in 2016: we looked at the 10,171 MOTs these cars had during 2025. Plus known faults and what to look at before you buy one.
What goes wrong more than usual on a 2016 Ford Ranger?
Parts flagged at MOT more often on the 2016 Ford Ranger than on all cars registered in 2016.
- Ball joint dust cover3.6× usualFord Ranger6.1% All 2016 cars1.7%
Failed outright at MOT: 0.6%, against 0.6% of all 2016 cars. The rest were advisories or minor defects.
Rough price £60–£150 (one joint) ClickMechanicAt the viewing: Listen for knocking over bumps and check the rubber boots behind the wheels aren't split.
- Number plate lights2.3× usualFord Ranger7.2% All 2016 cars3.2%
Failed outright at MOT: 1.8%, against 0.9% of all 2016 cars. The rest were advisories or minor defects.
Rough price £5–£40 our estimateAt the viewing: Check the number plate lights work and the plates are clean and legal.
- Coil springs1.9× usualFord Ranger7.7% All 2016 cars4.1%
Failed outright at MOT: 6.4%, against 2.5% of all 2016 cars. The rest were advisories or minor defects.
Rough price £175–£400 (pair, one axle) ClickMechanicAt the viewing: Look behind each wheel for a snapped spring coil, and listen for a clunk or twang when turning the wheel lock to lock with the car stopped.
- Engine oil leaks2.2× usualFord Ranger6.1% All 2016 cars2.8%
Failed outright at MOT: 0.2%, against 0.1% of all 2016 cars. The rest were advisories or minor defects.
Rough price £80–£600 our estimateAt the viewing: Look under the engine and where the car is usually parked for fresh oil. Ask whether the leak has been looked at.
- Transmission oil leaks5.8× usualFord Ranger2.9% All 2016 cars0.5%
Failed outright at MOT: 0%, against 0% of all 2016 cars. The rest were advisories or minor defects.
Rough price £80–£600 our estimateAt the viewing: Look under the engine and where the car is usually parked for fresh oil. Ask whether the leak has been looked at.
Tyre condition: 4.5% here, against 13.3% of all 2016 cars. Suspension arm bushes and joints: 1% here, against 6.1% of all 2016 cars.
Common 2016 Ford Ranger MOT failures and advisories
The share of 2016 Ford Ranger MOT tests where testers flagged each area, as a fail or an advisory. Rough prices are typical independent-garage costs.
- Tyres22% of testsRough price £70–£150
At the viewing: Check the tread on all four tyres, including the inside edges, and look for cracks or bulges.
- Suspension21% of testsRough price £120–£400
At the viewing: Listen for knocks over speed bumps, and look behind each front wheel for a snapped coil spring.
- Brakes20% of testsRough price £150–£350
At the viewing: Look for a lip on the disc edges and feel for judder or pulling when braking firmly from about 40mph.
- Lights and electrics19% of testsRough price £10–£80
At the viewing: Ask a friend to check every light, including brake lights and indicators, while you operate them.
- Oil and fluid leaks9% of testsRough price £80–£600
At the viewing: Look under the engine and on the ground where the car is usually parked for fresh oil or fluid.
- Wipers, windscreen and mirrors6% of testsRough price £15–£250
At the viewing: Check for chips in the driver's view, and test the wipers and washers.
Known faults on the 2016 Ford Ranger
Reported by owners, mechanics and buying guides for this model and age. Check which engine the car has, as some apply to one engine only.
- 3.2 diesel
Oil pump failure (3.2 diesel)
The most common problem: the 3.2 diesel's oil pump fails. Watch for ticking, low oil pressure or the engine light. Owners often fit a geared pump.
At the viewing: Listen for ticking at idle and make sure the oil light goes out.
- All engines
Chassis and wheel arch corrosion
Corrosion is common on the chassis and in the wheel arches.
At the viewing: Look underneath at the chassis rails and in the arches.
- All engines
Gearbox and turbo problems
Both manual and automatic gearboxes have had problems, and turbos can fail, shown by poor pulling and blue smoke.
At the viewing: Feel for slipping and harsh changes, and look for blue smoke.
Questions to ask the seller before buying a 2016 Ford Ranger
Ask before you travel to see it. A seller who knows the car will have answers, and receipts.
- Has the oil pump been replaced or upgraded?
- Has the chassis had rust treatment or repairs?
- Any recent work on the ball joint dust cover? (Flagged at MOT 3.6× as often on the 2016 Ford Ranger as on other cars the same age.)
- Any recent work on the number plate lights? (Flagged at MOT 2.3× as often on the 2016 Ford Ranger as on other cars the same age.)
- Any recent work on the coil springs? (Flagged at MOT 1.9× as often on the 2016 Ford Ranger as on other cars the same age.)
- Can I see the service history and receipts for any big jobs?
Looking at a Ford Ranger?
Check the actual car: its own MOT history, mileage and what to ask the seller. Free, no sign-up.
Other years
Every year of the Ford Ranger compared
| Year | MOT tests | Most flagged |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 513 | Tyres 13% |
| 2022 | 15,140 | Tyres 23% |
| 2021 | 15,990 | Tyres 22% |
| 2020 | 11,398 | Tyres 20% |
| 2019 | 14,131 | Tyres 20% |
| 2018 | 13,682 | Tyres 21% |
| 2017 | 10,386 | Tyres 21% |
| 2015 | 6,022 | Lights and electrics 30% |
| 2014 | 3,878 | Suspension 34% |
| 2013 | 2,787 | Suspension 40% |
| 2012 | 1,790 | Suspension 43% |
| 2011 | 1,415 | Brakes 43% |
| 2010 | 1,295 | Lights and electrics 45% |
| 2009 | 2,032 | Lights and electrics 48% |
| 2008 | 1,798 | Lights and electrics 49% |
| 2007 | 2,400 | Lights and electrics 48% |
| 2006 | 1,997 | Lights and electrics 47% |
| 2005 | 1,667 | Lights and electrics 46% |
| 2004 | 1,439 | Lights and electrics 45% |
| 2003 | 848 | Lights and electrics 44% |
| 2002 | 615 | Suspension 43% |
| 2001 | 468 | Brakes 44% |
| 2000 | 395 | Brakes 43% |
| 1999 | 165 | Suspension 45% |
Where this comes from: the DVSA's anonymised results for every MOT test done in Great Britain during 2025, counting the MOTs of Ford Ranger cars first registered in 2016. "Flagged" includes advisories, so it isn't the same as a fail rate. How we score